Reviews / 10 July 2004

Beyond the Valley of the Dolls

Beyond the Valley of the Dolls
USA  /  1970

Don’t get me wrong. I like Roger Ebert. He is easily America’s most well-known and trusted film critic. However, with trust comes power. Since he is trusted much more than any other critic, regardless of genre, his opinion weighs heavily on a film’s success. Roger Ebert, along with his partner, with one twist of his thumb can send thousands of ticket buyers rushing to the theatre. Equally, he can damn a picture. Like a modern Caesar, Ebert can with the downturn of his thumb sentence a film to commercial death. This is a power that he has used.

Unfortunately, he has used it against many of the films that are the bread and butter of the gang here at Not Coming. He once urged people not go see I Spit On Your Grave at all. In print he has called Caligula one of the worst films ever made. Along with Siskel he read a list of those involved in the making of the killer Santa flick Silent Night, Deadly Night on air in an open condemnation of their involvement. Since these and many, many films like them were not up to the standard that Mr. Ebert has set, let’s take a look at one that just might be.

Long ago (the 60’s) in a land far, far away (California) Roger Ebert co-wrote Beyond the Valley of the Dolls with Russ Meyer (Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill!). The film is an unauthorized “sequel” to the best-selling novel/film The Valley of the Dolls. During the opening credits there is a blurb to remind the audience that the film has nothing to do with its namesake, it merely works with the same themes. This much is true. Beyond the Valley of the Dolls is an odd morality tale set against the decadent background of late 60’s Los Angeles. Each character represents a vice or a virtue and by the end of the film is paid back in kind. One can assume that these themes were probably Ebert’s idea, not Meyer’s.

For those of you who are unfamiliar with the films of Russ Meyer, allow me to sum them all up for you. One word: Breasts. Meyer’s films revolve around the cleavage of his leading ladies. Beautiful and voluptuous women are the centerpiece of all of Meyer’s films and this one is no exception. There is no shortage of nudity by the main cast and extras alike, hence the X Rating.

The plot of the film is as flimsy as the paper it was typed on. An all-girl rock group along with their manager travel to California to become stars. Once there, the doe-eyed lead singer tracks down her aunt and finds out that she’s entitled to a large inheritance. As if that weren’t enough good fortune, her aunt is friends with a record producer who immediately makes them stars and re-dubs the group The Carrie Nations. That is the bulk of the storyline and it takes place within the first 20 minutes of the film. The rest of the film is a confusing trip as we watch the characters go through their respective moral lessons. Much like a modern daytime soap opera, there are tons of sex, drugs, and backstabbing. All of which lead up to a very strange and out of place ending. In a complete insult to the intelligence of the viewers, voice over narration is used just before the ending credits to further beat the audience over the head with the moral lessons contained therein.

As stated earlier, the film really intended to be watched for its plot. Thankfully though, there is more to enjoy than just the nudity. The dialogue is classic 60’s cheese. Almost everything said is such an over-the-top cliché of 60’s speech and slang that the film will become even more unintentionally humorous in the years to come. Pay particular attention to everything said by the record producer, Z-Man Bar-ell the “Teen Tycoon.” A lot of it reminds me of those scenes from sitcoms where the parent attempts to relate to the teenagers by incorrectly and humorously using the modern slang. Russ Meyer was old even back then and Ebert doesn’t strike me as a hip swinger type of guy, so I have no clue where they got most of this stuff. You’ll probably catch yourself rewinding different parts of the film just to hear the ridiculous things being said again and again. For added fun, try to count how many lines, word for word, that Z-Man uses that have found their way into the Austin Powers movies.

Beyond the Valley of the Dolls is the perfect example of a “so bad its good” movie. If it wasn’t X Rated, it could be the basis for the funniest episode of Mystery Science Theatre 3000 ever. It does have its redeeming qualities though, however small they may be.

Roger Ebert is a wonderful film critic and probably a very good writer as well. The majority of the reason this film is so amusing is simply because Roger Ebert wrote it. It is some kind of odd poetic justice that his movie is really this bad. The only moral lesson that one should take from this film is that you should take all criticism of art with a grain of salt. Don’t believe everything that Roger Ebert, Rex Reed, Gene Shalit, or even Rumsey and myself tell you. Go out and see the movies that you want to. Don’t like something just because someone told you that you should, and don’t hate it for that reason either. In the end the only critic that matters is you.


Comments / 6 total / Submit Comment

  1. Marc
    21 May 2005
    6:29 AM

    I think BTVOTD is the only thing that saves Roger Ebert from being the least interesting person alive. To read his “Great Movies” book series is to know the very definition of “vanilla.” I’m glad he made this movie, because it shows that at some point in his life he at least dabbled in subversiveness.


  2. shelter@airmail.net
    1 November 2005
    12:53 PM

    Wrong – the plot is anything but flimsy. There are plenty of flimsy plots out there but BVD is not one of them. Like the movie or not the plot is rich with unexpected twists and turns. I found it constantly surprising – something I like in a plot.


  3. jmiku
    20 December 2005
    2:32 PM

    No matter what Ebert’s original intentions were with this film — it’s a strange sort of masterpiece. A brilliant (albeit probably accidental) deconstruction of the melodrama. The quotability factor is through the roof and check out Myers direction. 90% of the time he doesn’t linger on any shot longer than 3 seconds. I mean, the cat just keeps cutting like mad…predicting the MTV/ADD generation 30 years before it’s time.


  4. Teddy
    14 May 2006
    11:07 PM
    Website

    One of the most common attacks on criticism is that is is purported against artists by those who couldn’t do the art themselves. Ebert’s inability to write a screenplay does not mean we have to take “criticism with a grain of salt.” It just means that he’s a better critic than screenwriter.


  5. Keith
    13 September 2006
    3:32 PM

    If you knew the backstory of BVD you’d appreciate the movie a lot more. Ebert wrote the script as he went on; Meyer basically would not allow him to change what had come before when he wrote a new twist. That technique sounds disastrous but BVD moves so fast it doesn’t matter. In this world, everything makes sense. Until Z-Man’s reveal, that is, but at that point, why not?

    It’s a satire! Everything you complain about (like the voiceover epilogue) is there for a reason. You think Ebert was unaware his script was full of cliches?


  6. jasper von sillyputty
    6 July 2007
    5:48 PM

    It’s called ‘camp’ David, look it up.


Submit Comment / Some HTML is OK / Preview your remarks below


Preview Comment

Credits

Directed by
Russ Meyer

Review by
David Carter

Source
VHS


Related articles

Features: Bosomania: The Sex, the Violence, and the Vocabulary of Russ Meyer


Statistics

Posted on
10 July 2004

Read
1353 times

Comments
6

Jump to comments
Submit comment

Recent Updates