No other band sounds quite like Morphine. The baritone sax, drums, and Mark Sandman’s 2-string slide bass and sultry voice are unmistakable from the very first notes. The documentary Cure for Pain: The Mark Sandman Story aims to bring us the dramatic life behind Sandman’s distinctive music. Alas, the technique does not live up to the tale. The movie falls somewhere between not revealing enough and revealing too much, leaving many questions about Sandman’s life unanswered, and raising one big, possibly unanswerable one: Does the mere fact of being an artist make a person’s life story a compelling one?
Cure for Pain clearly has great affection for Sandman and the people in his life, but the filmmakers’ lack of technical skill does them a great disservice. Many of the interviews are badly lit, blurry, and awkwardly composed, with interview subjects slipping in and out of frame and focus. (Other interviews look great, leading one to think that the poor ones are mistakes rather than an intentional style.) The sound recording is especially bad; several of the interviews require subtitles, and one of the most charismatic subjects, Morphine saxophonist Dana Colley, nearly has his microphone overwhelmed by the relentless chirping of birds in his suburban backyard. The archival footage and pictures are also of poor quality, with photographs zoomed on so far that they become a mass of printing dots and video bearing the wobbly distortion of an overplayed VHS tape. Some of these faults are beyond the filmmakers’ control: much of the early footage of the band and Sandman’s previous projects were shot in dark bars with crappy camcorders in the late 80s; it can’t be helped. But other flaws feel like a lack of skill or research. Surely the filmmakers could have gone to the trouble to obtain original photographs, rather than filming magazine prints. And they could have found a more visually compelling way to reveal information than close-ups of sloppily highlighted text.
You can get past technique if the topic is compelling enough. It seems, on the surface, as if Sandman’s life would make a profoundly compelling film. The child of an average middle-class family from Newton, Massachusetts, Sandman endured the death of both his younger brothers as he struggled to become a musician. Just when his unusual and uncompromising sound found an audience, Sandman himself suddenly passed away, suffering a heart attack on stage when he was only 47. (Despite the drug use implied by the band’s name, Sandman’s death was ruled, in medical terms, “just one of those things.”)
But Cure for Pain is fundamentally unsatisfying for reasons that even the most skilled filmmakers couldn’t have helped. Sandman’s life may simply not want to become a film. Sandman was a notably private person, and it’s completely understandable that those closest to him are reluctant to put their relationships, and their grief, on display for the public. (Except for a melodramatic Ben Harper, that is, who can’t seem to get enough.) The filmmakers, too, seem content to get a few facts without digging any deeper. We learn that the Sandman family suffered the tragic loss of two children, but almost nothing about how those deaths affected his life and music. We learn that Sandman held a variety of nomadic and unusual jobs, including at a cannery in Alaska, but no one knows or says much about that time in his life. We see how painfully disconnected Sandman was from his parents (they seemed to have absolutely no idea that their son was an established and celebrated musician), but the interviewer never presses them to find out how they feel about that distance.
Learning this much and no more about Sandman’s life makes one question whether we want to know anything at all. I think it’s fair to call Morphine “musicians’ musicians.” While their music is a joy to listen to, the joy feels more like a deep admiration of technique rather than a passionate and personal emotional connection. Morphine’s music is good because of its sound; it’s no coincidence that the film suddenly looks a lot better when the band’s undeniable cool slinks out of the soundtrack. That sound itself is aloof, chill, and sexy, the kind of vibe that benefits far more from Sandman’s cultivated air of mystery than from a documentarian’s cause-and-effect revelations. Sandman’s biography, as tragic as it was, isn’t audible in his music the way someone like Kurt Cobain’s was. And the tragedies of his life feel like the sad, private, and personal tragedies of a flesh-and-blood family, not the mythic plot twists of your typical music bio.
In some ways, this is morally comforting. Sandman was a real human being, not a character in a celebrity role-play so familiar it’s become cinematic cliché. But trying to make a documentary about this real human being whose only remarkable aspect was his art puts the filmmakers—and the viewer—in an uncomfortable spot. Why do we feel the need to know about lives of people who make good art? Why do we believe the music is more meaningful if those lives were difficult or painful? Is it possible that the art would be better if it stood on its own, away from any details or preconceptions about the person who made it?
I’ve possibly thought a lot more about Cure for Pain and its implications than the filmmakers intended. The movie itself comes off as a well intentioned, somewhat amateurish, and possibly too-respectful tribute to an artist the filmmakers admired. I was sorry to miss the “Rock Docs” panel discussion, at which questions like these may have been brought up. But this unanswered question was my main response to Cure for Pain, and in that sense, it was a powerful and provocative documentary. Whatever its flaws, Cure for Pain makes you appreciate Morphine, and music as a whole, for its own sake and on its own terms, despite—not because of—the acute sadness of Sandman’s life.
Katherine Follett / © 2011 NotComing.com
Review by
Katherine Follett
Posted on
11 May 2011
Source
Projected DVD
Features
The 2011 Independent Film Festival Boston
Read
4663 times
Comments
7
Road House, Every face punch: http://t.co/NgxOiUQG / via @supercutorg
Comments 7 total / Submit Comment
bifferspice on 16 May 2011 at 3:06 AM
hi. no idea if i’ll ever see this, but i had never heard of the band and went and checked them out on youtube, and i think they’re brilliant. so thanks for that ;)
Berekin on 26 October 2011 at 10:56 PM
The rest of your critique is insightful, but this quoted part is not merely malinformed (I can list you 50 people right off the top of my head who lived and breathed Morphine in the 90's, and they're from all around the world, from the US to Japan to my Eastern Europe), but is also quite presumptuous! You, my friend, just made a ridiculous hasty generalization error, thinking that because you personally had made no passionate connection to Mark and Dana and their ingenious aural acropolis of cool coping with fundamental human sadness, nobody else had. You are wrong, I'm certain of it.
Klein on 30 November 2011 at 10:24 AM
Berekin: Dude, lighten up. Different people perceive music differently, and this review is ultimately only an opinion. Unless you're relying off from empiricism, there is generally no right or wrong with topics like these. Personally, I find Morphine's music very moving and easy to empathize with, but I have noticed Sandman often stripping his lyrics to a minimal quality which, for me, makes the relating thing a little less consistent on Morphine's albums versus other bands I listen to.
JWH on 14 December 2011 at 8:47 PM
I agree with Berekin above — the statement that Morphine's music isn't conducive to a "passionate and personal" connection is, for many listeners, exceedingly wrong. My own connection to Mark Sandman's music is passionate and personal indeed. Hope this film comes out in theaters and/or DVD.
Diego [Bravo] on 2 January 2012 at 11:25 PM
"Why do we believe the music is more meaningful if those lives were difficult or painful? "
It kid of reminds me in a way to paint, for example, Rembrandt, and some incredible portraits that he had to make for a rich guy in those times. I mean, he was forced to make it because of money: those needy years that were struggling him. But the truthful art overcomes all of that . The explanation about the subject (the rich person who pays the artist), could not tell you more than what an incredible technique does Rembrandt used to deliver for cheap (or like you said in this case : the sound), but it does, and once you know it. Delivers the human side of things /not only the untouchable absolutist surface where we tend to stare artists as gods.
That is what sacred its all about in its "real" form : Mark still a myth, and myths tend to last a very long time, it doesn't matter if it is just for one person.
So, for me, it is not more meaningful because of Sandman's tragic life; may have been less tragic, but, he had the sensibility, and that may just happened to him as a little boy watching the docks flying by the lake one crazy night, he just needed two words -that I'm still relate to- to say it right: "the unexplainable".
BenF on 1 February 2012 at 12:23 PM
Morphine's music is not that complicated technically, as a matter of fact, I am guessing they wanted it to be simple and created a sound around the idea of "low" rock… How more simple can you get when you take two strings out of a bass, who only has 4 to begin with ? I relate to Morphine for the images the music puts in my head and the state they leave me in when I listen to them, and Mark's words and poetry are also a BIG PART of why I like Morphine since the first time I heard it in 91.
Are we ever going to see this doc on screen in France ? Anyone knows ? I have been hunting for info but no one has ever answered.
Take care.
Langusta on 9 February 2012 at 3:10 AM Website
Where have you seen it? Hundreds of fans in Russia and Ukraine are waiting and waiting and waiting, so long… Does anyone know, if is possible to get a copy, or download it, or buy? Thanks