Reviews / 20 February 2005

Leave Her to Heaven

Leave Her to Heaven
USA  /  1945

On a train ride to a friend’s ranch in New Mexico where he is to work on his new novel, Richard Harland meets a remarkably beautiful woman who, unbeknownst to either of them, is on a journey to the same ranch. Although she is engaged to be married, Ellen Berent falls hard and fast for Richard and her feelings are returned. They marry days after. Cutting their honeymoon short to visit Danny, Richard’s crippled brother, Ellen devotes all of her time to helping Danny learn again to walk. It seems that Ellen is the perfect wife and perfect sister-in-law until she learns that Danny will be coming to live with her and Richard at their secluded cabin in Maine. Not wanting to have to share Richard’s love with anyone, Ellen begins to devise a plan to keep Danny, and anyone else who might interfere, out of the picture.

The premise and style of Leave Her to Heaven is pure melodrama, and it was directed by one of the great practitioners in the genre, John M. Stahl. Stahl, an old hand from the silent era, also directed the original versions of Imitation of Life and Magnificent Obsession, both later remade by Douglas Sirk. Yet this movie has a darker tone that feels right at home amid that other popular genre of the 1940s, film noir. There are no guns in the movie, but there is a body count, and Ellen Berent makes for one heck of a femme fatale. Furthermore, the film starts not with the meet-cute between Ellen and Richard on the train but with a flashback framing device that cues the audience into some deep personal tragedy that has befallen Richard and to the fact that he has served a couple years of prison time. From the first few moments of the picture, we suspect that there will not be a happy ending, despite the backdrop of a pristine lake in Maine.

Though the story is involving enough to make this film a classic, it is perhaps more rightly renowned for its incredible Technicolor cinematography and strikingly original set and costume design. The look of the film is difficult to describe other than to say that every blue in the film matches Gene Tierney’s eyes and every red matches her lipstick and to insist that this is not an exaggeration. This film features one of the most precisely engineered color schemes in the history of color movies and not a flower, book spine, or tchotchke in the frame clashes or distracts from the overall look. For this reason, even though it is firmly rooted in generic conventions, the film remains very much unlike any other ever made.


Comments / 3 total / Submit Comment

  1. Marc
    21 May 2005
    7:10 AM

    LHTH ranks with “Psycho” and “Mulholland Drive” for taking such an audacious 180 degree turn half-way through the movie. The movie threatens to be a fairly standard Fox melodrama, then rides completely off the tracks once Tierney….well, you know.

    I remember the pleasure of seeing this in 35mm, with a film class, and hearing the collective gasps in the auditorium during the lake sequence. Boy did people sit up and take notice for the remainder of the film!

    Excellent point on the set design. The film is so meticulous and detailed—which makes the hurried, clumsy and fairly stark courtroom sequence feel out of step with the rest of the movie (I would say it almost ruins it).


  2. dave
    21 January 2007
    6:03 PM
    Website

    one note: Gene Tierney’s eyes are green. there’s a thing with Technicolor that doesn’t accurately represent certain colors on DVD transfers‚Ķ Gone With The Wind is forever ruined for me on DVD because Vivien Leigh’s brilliant green eyes, like Tierney’s, are turned blue on the DVD version. You need to see a good print of these films to get the full effect. Both are built around color contrasts against their stars’ eyes (GWTW more so, but also this film). In each case, IT’S A WHOLE DIFFERENT MOVIE when their eyes are green…. those red dresses nearly POP off the screen when playing off of Gene Tierney’s eyes.


  3. Matt
    27 August 2007
    5:39 PM
    Website

    Thanks for the correction, Dave. It’s very interesting and provides yet another reason why DVD is no substitute for a good 35mm film print.


Submit Comment / Some HTML is OK / Preview your remarks below


Preview Comment

Credits

Directed by
John M. Stahl

Review by
Matt Bailey

Source
Fox Studio Classics DVD


Statistics

Posted on
20 February 2005

Read
1275 times

Comments
3

Jump to comments
Submit comment

Recent Updates