Screening Log
This new site feature is a collective effort to summarize our viewing habits. Occasionally, you will find titles here that are coming to a theater near you, in addition to films viewed on television, and even films viewed in piecemeal. The screening log is archived each month; to view past entries select a month in the menu below.
February 2006 activity
Total Log Entries: 47
- Adam (3)
- Andrew (0)
- Chet (0)
- Chiranjit (0)
- David (0)
- Eva (0)
- Evan (0)
- Ian (6)
- Jenny (1)
- Katherine (0)
- Leo (10)
- Megan (0)
- Rumsey (12)
- Teddy (0)
- Thomas (3)
- Timothy (0)
- Victoria (0)
Total Comments: 35
- Curse of the Cat People (0)
- Munich (0)
- Elephant (0)
- Bill & Ted’s Bogus Journey (0)
- The Wicker Man (1)
- New York Doll (0)
- Winter Passing (3)
- The New World (4)
- Date Movie (2)
- The Lost World (0)
- Transamerica (0)
- Paths Of Glory (0)
- Dark City (0)
- What Time is it There? (0)
- Crime Wave (2)
- Syriana (0)
- Batman Begins (6)
- How To Lose A Guy In Ten Days (0)
- Four Brothers (0)
- Munich (0)
- Little Fish (0)
- The Ballad of Cable Hogue (0)
- Out of the Past (0)
- Wind Across the Everglades (6)
- Rebel Without a Cause (0)
- The Lusty Men (0)
- Ghostbusters (0)
- Manderlay (0)
- The Rite (1)
- Neil Young: Heart of Gold (0)
- Mutiny on the Bounty (0)
- Breaking Away (1)
- Hero (0)
- Day For Night (0)
- Secret Defense (0)
- Over The Edge (0)
- Darkman (2)
- Ryan (0)
- Rubber Johnny (0)
- The Three Burials Of Melquiades Estrada (0)
- Little Otik (0)
- Elizabethtown (0)
- Peeping Tom (1)
- Hellboy (0)
- The 40 Year-Old Virgin (0)
- Monterey Pop (0)
- Badlands (6)
Full Archive
Advertisements
Elephant / USA / 2003
As a deliberately opaque rumination on the motivations behind violence, Gus Van Sant’s Elephant is eclipsed by Alan Clarke’s film, from which its title is taken. Both, indirectly or not, are employments of suspense; Clarke’s film, replete with anonymous characters and no dialogue, is unpretentious (and absolutely jarring in its starkness) for this reason, but Van Sant’s isn’t as it intends sympathy for its naive adolescents—they embody a more successful utility as expendables in a horror film. And it is to this end that the film works exceptionally well. The final act commences with brief, concentrated flash-forwards of the inevitable violence, teases for the bloodshed the concept promises.
by Rumsey Taylor | Source: HBO
27 Feb 2006 11:15 AM | Submit Comment